Integrity & Anticorruption

Theme: Integrity & Anticorruption ✓
Countries with examples PRC Cambodia Myanmar
Example answer — for demonstration

What anti-corruption measures improved trust?

Same answer, your way

Watch · 1 min · AI-narrated from ADB sources
Integrity by Design: Building Global Anti-Corruption Capacity
Listen · 5 min · AI-narrated from ADB sources

Since 2018, ADB has run a sustained capacity-building program with PRC contractors and institutions bidding on international contracts — many of whom, lacking familiarity with global integrity standards, have ended up on ADB’s or other multilateral development banks’ sanctions lists [1]. Rather than relying on enforcement alone, ADB partnered with the Xiamen National Accounting Institute to run annual Anticorruption and Integrity Forums, now in their third year, covering public procurement, financial management, and environmental and social safeguards [2]. The first forum drew 254 participants, with 98% reporting they intended to apply what they learned immediately [3]. From 2024 onward, the forum expanded beyond PRC participants to contractors from across the wider Asia-Pacific region [2].

Evidence cards

Technical assistance

Asia-Pacific Anticorruption and Integrity Strengthening

A technical assistance program building integrity capacity among PRC firms bidding on international contracts.

View source →
Speech

2nd Asia-Pacific Anticorruption and Integrity Forum

VP Roberta Casali on expanding the forum beyond PRC participants to the wider Asia-Pacific region.

View source →
Event page

3rd Asia-Pacific Integrity and Compliance Forum

The forum’s third edition, themed “Delivering Development with Integrity.”

View source →

Implementation considerations

  • Capacity building works best paired with real consequence — ADB’s sanctions list gives these forums genuine stakes, not just goodwill training.
  • Bringing multiple multilateral development banks into the same room avoids contractors learning one bank’s rules and assuming they all match.
  • A 98% stated intent to apply lessons is a useful signal, but it’s self-reported immediately after the event — durable impact would need follow-up data over time.

Where else has this worked?