Aging Society & Health

Explore policies, implementation, and lessons grounded in ADB publications.

Key insight

How can cities adapt to population aging?

Same answer, your way

Watch · 1 min · AI-narrated from ADB sources
The Yichang Model for Integrated Urban Aging Systems
Listen · 7 min · AI-narrated from ADB sources

PRC has been building a reference model in Yichang City, Hubei Province, where about a quarter of the 4 million residents are already over 60 — well above the national average. Since 2014, ADB has supported the city through technical assistance and two loans, including a $150 million project to build a three-tiered elderly care system spanning home-based, community-based, and residential care [1]. Rather than building high-end retirement villages, the program shifted toward serving low- and middle-income elderly, integrating health care and elderly care through a new city-wide ICT platform and a dedicated geriatric care hospital [2]. In June 2022, Yichang was named one of the PRC’s first “National Key Contact Cities” for its response to aging, positioning it as a demonstration model for other cities and provinces to replicate [3].

Evidence

Project page

Hubei Yichang Comprehensive Elderly Care Demonstration Project

A $150 million loan funding 16 community-based care centers, a dementia care center, and an ICT platform integrating elderly and health services.

View source →
Results story

Upgrading Elderly Care in Yichang City, PRC

Documents the shift from high-end retirement housing to a three-tiered model serving low- and middle-income elderly.

View source →
Working paper

Elderly Care System Development in Yichang, PRC

East Asia Working Paper No. 67 — analyzes lessons from Yichang’s strategic plan as a model for replication.

View source →

What made this work?

  • A three-tiered system only works if community-based services are built first — Yichang prioritized local centers before scaling residential capacity.
  • Integrating elderly care with the health system requires a shared data platform, not just co-located facilities.
  • Shifting from high-end retirement housing to serving low- and middle-income elderly is a deliberate policy choice, not a default outcome — it has to be designed in from the start.

Where else could this apply?

Key insight

How does PRC integrate health care and elderly care?

Same answer, your way

Watch · 2 min · AI-narrated from ADB sources
Blending Medical Treatment with Daily Care in Guangxi
Listen · 6 min · AI-narrated from ADB sources

Yichang demonstrated how to build a three-tiered elderly care system spanning home, community, and residential care. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region tackled a different part of the same problem: once that structure exists, how do you actually connect it to the health care system? In 2019, ADB approved a $100 million loan to integrate elderly care and health care across Nanning and Hezhou municipalities, introducing public-private partnership standards to the sector for the first time in the region [1]. The project funds a hospital discharge management system so elderly patients move into community or residential care directly, rather than falling into the gap between hospital and home, and it establishes a standardized care-needs-assessment framework — addressing a region where more than 85% of elderly residents live with at least one chronic condition and roughly 60% live with multiple conditions [2].

Evidence

Project page

Demonstration of Guangxi Elderly Care and Health Care Integration and PPP Project

A $100 million loan funding four elderly care and health facilities in Nanning and Hezhou, one operated as a public-private partnership.

View source →
Project page

Hebei Elderly Care Development Project

PRC’s first ADB-financed three-tiered elderly care system, approved 2017.

View source →
Project page

Xiangyang Elderly Care Demonstration Project

A PPP-based elderly care and health integration project, approved by ADB in 2021.

View source →

What made this work?

  • Coordinating hospital discharge with community and residential care requires a shared handoff system, not just shared funding.
  • Bringing in a private-sector operator for one facility tests whether PPP standards can work in a sector PRC had previously run entirely as public.
  • A standardized needs-assessment framework has to come before service matching — you can’t route people to the right tier of care without first measuring what they actually need.

Where else could this apply?